<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Square &#8211; Glass Onion Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksquare.com/daily-square-447/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksquare.com/daily-square-447/</link>
	<description>Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/daily-square-447/comment-page-1/#comment-168622</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1408482135#comment-168622</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about that: in what way could studios have refused to &quot;let&quot; Netflix exist?  Technically what Netflix did was legal even before they entered into revenue-sharing agreements.  Do you think the studios would have managed to get a first sale exemption a la records and software?  More to the current point, do you think there&#039;s a real chance that book publishers could?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about that: in what way could studios have refused to &#8220;let&#8221; Netflix exist?  Technically what Netflix did was legal even before they entered into revenue-sharing agreements.  Do you think the studios would have managed to get a first sale exemption a la records and software?  More to the current point, do you think there&#8217;s a real chance that book publishers could?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kassia Krozser</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/daily-square-447/comment-page-1/#comment-168618</link>
		<dc:creator>Kassia Krozser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1408482135#comment-168618</guid>
		<description>amen! As I keep noting, do you honestly think the studios would let Netflix exist if they weren&#039;t getting ongoing compensation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amen! As I keep noting, do you honestly think the studios would let Netflix exist if they weren&#8217;t getting ongoing compensation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conspicuouschick</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/daily-square-447/comment-page-1/#comment-168617</link>
		<dc:creator>conspicuouschick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1408482135#comment-168617</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s unfortunate but the majority of the comments following the article about Bookswim don&#039;t seem to understand the difference between libraries or selling used books and what Netflix etc and Bookswim are doing.  It appears some major public education is needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate but the majority of the comments following the article about Bookswim don&#8217;t seem to understand the difference between libraries or selling used books and what Netflix etc and Bookswim are doing.  It appears some major public education is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

