<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hansel and Gretel Were Right: Number 99 in Our Series on Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksquare.com/hansel-and-gretel-were-right-number-99-in-our-series-on-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksquare.com/hansel-and-gretel-were-right-number-99-in-our-series-on-search/</link>
	<description>Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Team Coverage of the O'Reilly TOC Conference &#124; Oxford Media Works</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/hansel-and-gretel-were-right-number-99-in-our-series-on-search/comment-page-1/#comment-165983</link>
		<dc:creator>Team Coverage of the O'Reilly TOC Conference &#124; Oxford Media Works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 01:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2007/06/19/2439/#comment-165983</guid>
		<description>[...] Hansel and Gretel Were Right: Number 99 in Our Series on Search &#8212; If publishers need to learn one thing it should probably be that Google is not the enemy. Better to work with all search engines than to try to build your own.   Posted on June 26, 2007 Filed Under: Publishing &#183; Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hansel and Gretel Were Right: Number 99 in Our Series on Search &#8212; If publishers need to learn one thing it should probably be that Google is not the enemy. Better to work with all search engines than to try to build your own.   Posted on June 26, 2007 Filed Under: Publishing &middot; Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Coulter</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/hansel-and-gretel-were-right-number-99-in-our-series-on-search/comment-page-1/#comment-165958</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda Coulter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2007/06/19/2439/#comment-165958</guid>
		<description>Oh, man, thanks for mentioning &lt;i&gt;Buckaroo Banzai&lt;/i&gt;. I&#039;ve never found anyone who loved that movie the way I did. (I&#039;m beginning to think I&#039;m running with the wrong crowd.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, man, thanks for mentioning <i>Buckaroo Banzai</i>. I&#8217;ve never found anyone who loved that movie the way I did. (I&#8217;m beginning to think I&#8217;m running with the wrong crowd.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/hansel-and-gretel-were-right-number-99-in-our-series-on-search/comment-page-1/#comment-165948</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2007/06/19/2439/#comment-165948</guid>
		<description>That sounds all really interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds all really interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/hansel-and-gretel-were-right-number-99-in-our-series-on-search/comment-page-1/#comment-165946</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2007/06/19/2439/#comment-165946</guid>
		<description>Considering I am a new visitor to the B.S. family (however, I already possess two other B.S. distinctions), readings on the topic of finability were slightly ironic.  Yes, the infamous Google led me to your page during a blog search for &quot;TOC conference&quot; implying familiarity with O&#039;Reilly and the changing dynmaics in the publishing industry.  
In response to &quot;If they can&#039;t find you, they can&#039;t find you,&quot; I agree for the most part but am excited about tools from contextual reliant companies such as Inform and Adaptive Blue.  Neither of the companies currently offer a specific solution to the problems you describe, but both are attempting to understand inquiries at a deeper level than Google.  Semantics, Folksonomies, collective wisdom, recommendations - all are steadily contributing to a more human friendly experience. Unfortunately, these methods still result in abundance and requires sifting, but the technology is available...excited for the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering I am a new visitor to the B.S. family (however, I already possess two other B.S. distinctions), readings on the topic of finability were slightly ironic.  Yes, the infamous Google led me to your page during a blog search for &#8220;TOC conference&#8221; implying familiarity with O&#8217;Reilly and the changing dynmaics in the publishing industry.<br />
In response to &#8220;If they can&#8217;t find you, they can&#8217;t find you,&#8221; I agree for the most part but am excited about tools from contextual reliant companies such as Inform and Adaptive Blue.  Neither of the companies currently offer a specific solution to the problems you describe, but both are attempting to understand inquiries at a deeper level than Google.  Semantics, Folksonomies, collective wisdom, recommendations &#8211; all are steadily contributing to a more human friendly experience. Unfortunately, these methods still result in abundance and requires sifting, but the technology is available&#8230;excited for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
