<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mood Scale: Just Below Crabby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/</link>
	<description>Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/comment-page-1/#comment-108744</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/10/12/1612/#comment-108744</guid>
		<description>Agreed. There are far too many mediocre(and not just to some people) romances being published and no one seems to have a problem with it, as though by just being published is good enough. I know first hand how much hard work goes into creating a novel, but I am always left, scratching my head when yet another book flies onto the shelves full of errors,tepid characters and weak plotting. It makes me wonder whether writers see becoming published as such the be all end all Big Prize that constructive criticism and critiquing is viewed as &quot;fraternizing with the enemy&quot;. Why don&#039;t we writers hold each other accountable for what we&#039;re writing? As Kassia said, not to bash anyone or proclaim them a hack, but to push higher, to want, to need, to deliver to readers what they deliver when they decide to purchase your book. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. There are far too many mediocre(and not just to some people) romances being published and no one seems to have a problem with it, as though by just being published is good enough. I know first hand how much hard work goes into creating a novel, but I am always left, scratching my head when yet another book flies onto the shelves full of errors,tepid characters and weak plotting. It makes me wonder whether writers see becoming published as such the be all end all Big Prize that constructive criticism and critiquing is viewed as &#8220;fraternizing with the enemy&#8221;. Why don&#8217;t we writers hold each other accountable for what we&#8217;re writing? As Kassia said, not to bash anyone or proclaim them a hack, but to push higher, to want, to need, to deliver to readers what they deliver when they decide to purchase your book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selah March</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/comment-page-1/#comment-108458</link>
		<dc:creator>Selah March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/10/12/1612/#comment-108458</guid>
		<description>And they say it&#039;s we erotic romance peddlers who court the disrespect for the genre. Bah. 

&quot;Don&#039;t look too closely. Don&#039;t expect too much. Don&#039;t set the bar too high. WE&#039;RE JUST GIRRRRLS.&quot;

Bah again.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they say it&#8217;s we erotic romance peddlers who court the disrespect for the genre. Bah. </p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t look too closely. Don&#8217;t expect too much. Don&#8217;t set the bar too high. WE&#8217;RE JUST GIRRRRLS.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bah again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KathyF</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/comment-page-1/#comment-108445</link>
		<dc:creator>KathyF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/10/12/1612/#comment-108445</guid>
		<description>Is the industry actually slumping? Why oh why am I not surprised? 

OT, but did you read the Steve Almond piece in Salon? Or did I miss it? When he said &quot;the modern writer is engaged in an enterprise almost guaranteed to crush her spirit&quot; I don&#039;t think he was just talking about romance writers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the industry actually slumping? Why oh why am I not surprised? </p>
<p>OT, but did you read the Steve Almond piece in Salon? Or did I miss it? When he said &#8220;the modern writer is engaged in an enterprise almost guaranteed to crush her spirit&#8221; I don&#8217;t think he was just talking about romance writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/comment-page-1/#comment-108369</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/10/12/1612/#comment-108369</guid>
		<description>Romance writers don&#039;t publically review each other&#039;s books because the person critiqued will come after the reviewer with guns blazing and fangs bared.

It&#039;s not being too sensitive. It&#039;s an attempt to keep it sweetness and light. 

Which is why I don&#039;t read romances anymore. I want to know if a book sucks before I plunk down 8 bucks for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romance writers don&#8217;t publically review each other&#8217;s books because the person critiqued will come after the reviewer with guns blazing and fangs bared.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not being too sensitive. It&#8217;s an attempt to keep it sweetness and light. </p>
<p>Which is why I don&#8217;t read romances anymore. I want to know if a book sucks before I plunk down 8 bucks for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabel</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/comment-page-1/#comment-108330</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/10/12/1612/#comment-108330</guid>
		<description>Damn straight. 

As long as a genre emphasizes being nice, and sensitive, and trying *really really hard* over critical assessment, as long as it promotes some sort of misguided sense that one has a special connection to those who happen to share one&#039;s plumbing and thus owes them extra consideration, as long as it, in short, acts like the bigeyed emo-poetry writing chick who made the rest of us roll our eyes in every class she was in...

..then that genre is neither going to get nor deserve respect. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn straight. </p>
<p>As long as a genre emphasizes being nice, and sensitive, and trying *really really hard* over critical assessment, as long as it promotes some sort of misguided sense that one has a special connection to those who happen to share one&#8217;s plumbing and thus owes them extra consideration, as long as it, in short, acts like the bigeyed emo-poetry writing chick who made the rest of us roll our eyes in every class she was in&#8230;</p>
<p>..then that genre is neither going to get nor deserve respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Scott</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/comment-page-1/#comment-108314</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/10/12/1612/#comment-108314</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not alone, I&#039;m pretty sick of sycophantic reviews too. 

I understand that some authors may not want to publicly bash their peers, but I&#039;m of the mind that they owe it to readers to be honest. 

If they can&#039;t say what they feel, then they should leave the reviewing to the people who aren&#039;t afraid to tell it how it is.  Nice Girls need not apply.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not alone, I&#8217;m pretty sick of sycophantic reviews too. </p>
<p>I understand that some authors may not want to publicly bash their peers, but I&#8217;m of the mind that they owe it to readers to be honest. </p>
<p>If they can&#8217;t say what they feel, then they should leave the reviewing to the people who aren&#8217;t afraid to tell it how it is.  Nice Girls need not apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Kelly</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/comment-page-1/#comment-108247</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/10/12/1612/#comment-108247</guid>
		<description>Booksquare,

I don&#039;t know much about the romance genre, but I wholeheartedly agree with your take on how higher expectations can at least encourage, if not ensure (insure?) better writing.  That very issue is why I feel like the book I recently finished should have at least ten other women listed as co-authors - despite my initial difficulty with receiving criticism in my writing group, it&#039;s exactly what helped me become the kind of writer who *could* write this book.  I was totally up for the task of writing something crappier when I joined the group, and I&#039;m not saying I&#039;ve written the kinky War and Peace or anything now, but to the extent I&#039;ve succeeded in writing something that doesn&#039;t suck, it&#039;s because other writers told me when I was writing stuff that did.  

Your fan,
Joan
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Booksquare,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know much about the romance genre, but I wholeheartedly agree with your take on how higher expectations can at least encourage, if not ensure (insure?) better writing.  That very issue is why I feel like the book I recently finished should have at least ten other women listed as co-authors &#8211; despite my initial difficulty with receiving criticism in my writing group, it&#8217;s exactly what helped me become the kind of writer who *could* write this book.  I was totally up for the task of writing something crappier when I joined the group, and I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;ve written the kinky War and Peace or anything now, but to the extent I&#8217;ve succeeded in writing something that doesn&#8217;t suck, it&#8217;s because other writers told me when I was writing stuff that did.  </p>
<p>Your fan,<br />
Joan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Coulter</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/comment-page-1/#comment-108244</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda Coulter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/10/12/1612/#comment-108244</guid>
		<description>Booksquare, I&#039;ll see your crabby mood and raise you one TMJ headache.

I didn&#039;t say romance writers shouldn&#039;t review romance novels. I was explaining why they rarely &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; it. And I was urging all reviewers who trash books to, as I put it in one of the comments, &quot;be fair and reasonable about it and not appear to derive any pleasure from the experience.&quot;

Yours truly,
Just another delicate flower

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Booksquare, I&#8217;ll see your crabby mood and raise you one TMJ headache.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say romance writers shouldn&#8217;t review romance novels. I was explaining why they rarely <i>do</i> it. And I was urging all reviewers who trash books to, as I put it in one of the comments, &#8220;be fair and reasonable about it and not appear to derive any pleasure from the experience.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yours truly,<br />
Just another delicate flower</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosina Lippi</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/comment-page-1/#comment-108242</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosina Lippi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/10/12/1612/#comment-108242</guid>
		<description>I agree with you down the line, argument for argument. Having said that, I&#039;d like to point out that there&#039;s a dynamic going on that may be part of the reason behind Coulter&#039;s (in my view, erroneous) position: 

There is a group of romance writers who give each other unconditional love and support, just as there are many critics who automatically dismiss and/or trivialize every novel shelved under romance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you down the line, argument for argument. Having said that, I&#8217;d like to point out that there&#8217;s a dynamic going on that may be part of the reason behind Coulter&#8217;s (in my view, erroneous) position: </p>
<p>There is a group of romance writers who give each other unconditional love and support, just as there are many critics who automatically dismiss and/or trivialize every novel shelved under romance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernita</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/mood-scale-just-below-crabby/comment-page-1/#comment-108241</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/10/12/1612/#comment-108241</guid>
		<description>Seen just a little too much of &quot;It&#039;s a fab read&quot; and &quot;Just awesome, congrats!&quot; lately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seen just a little too much of &#8220;It&#8217;s a fab read&#8221; and &#8220;Just awesome, congrats!&#8221; lately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

