<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More On Google; We Never Rest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksquare.com/more-on-google-we-never-rest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksquare.com/more-on-google-we-never-rest/</link>
	<description>Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:57:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Booksquare</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/more-on-google-we-never-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-127704</link>
		<dc:creator>Booksquare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2006/06/04/1992/#comment-127704</guid>
		<description>But of course. Stay tuned. Constructive thoughts are wending their way through my pathetic little brain even as I type (actually, all weekend, except during naptime). First, of course, we have to break their spirits...it&#039;s like the military, with printing presses.

Google is search. MSN is search. Other search is search. These search companies are also going to move into providing physical or digital product. If done right, this product will serve as an adjunct to various distribution streams. My biggest fear is that publishing will lock into the single-provider model (see: music industry, failed experiments) rather than seeing search as the tool it is. 

I believe that it is in the best interest of publishers to cast as wide a net as possible. You cannot guess what avenue your customers will take to get to you, but you can be sure that they&#039;re not all taking the same route.

Please, someone stop me before I get all metaphorical...

Love you too, Joan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But of course. Stay tuned. Constructive thoughts are wending their way through my pathetic little brain even as I type (actually, all weekend, except during naptime). First, of course, we have to break their spirits&#8230;it&#8217;s like the military, with printing presses.</p>
<p>Google is search. MSN is search. Other search is search. These search companies are also going to move into providing physical or digital product. If done right, this product will serve as an adjunct to various distribution streams. My biggest fear is that publishing will lock into the single-provider model (see: music industry, failed experiments) rather than seeing search as the tool it is. </p>
<p>I believe that it is in the best interest of publishers to cast as wide a net as possible. You cannot guess what avenue your customers will take to get to you, but you can be sure that they&#8217;re not all taking the same route.</p>
<p>Please, someone stop me before I get all metaphorical&#8230;</p>
<p>Love you too, Joan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoin Purcell</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/more-on-google-we-never-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-127683</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoin Purcell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2006/06/04/1992/#comment-127683</guid>
		<description>I loved the post and the link but I wonder if instead of dissing publishers we should encourage them to make the leap into infrastructure themselves and provide a wide range of outlets and digital databases for books to avoid an i-Tunes like development where one company has a virtual monopoly of distribution? If Google proves to be the best provider of search tech for books that could be how it develops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the post and the link but I wonder if instead of dissing publishers we should encourage them to make the leap into infrastructure themselves and provide a wide range of outlets and digital databases for books to avoid an i-Tunes like development where one company has a virtual monopoly of distribution? If Google proves to be the best provider of search tech for books that could be how it develops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/more-on-google-we-never-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-127669</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2006/06/04/1992/#comment-127669</guid>
		<description>Thanks for being a book-lover who also loves the idea (and reality) of progress, instead of one who pretends there&#039;s something cooler or more authentic about loving books only when they&#039;re in one, old-fashioned format.  Goddammit we love Booksquare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for being a book-lover who also loves the idea (and reality) of progress, instead of one who pretends there&#8217;s something cooler or more authentic about loving books only when they&#8217;re in one, old-fashioned format.  Goddammit we love Booksquare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Booksquare</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/more-on-google-we-never-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-127654</link>
		<dc:creator>Booksquare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2006/06/04/1992/#comment-127654</guid>
		<description>Robots are more afraid of you than you are them.

Sure, Google is a big scary monster, but there will be another big scary monster after them. Google and MS are simply laying the groundwork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robots are more afraid of you than you are them.</p>
<p>Sure, Google is a big scary monster, but there will be another big scary monster after them. Google and MS are simply laying the groundwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thayer</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/more-on-google-we-never-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-127653</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2006/06/04/1992/#comment-127653</guid>
		<description>Your common sense view of publishing is refreshing. Remember, though, that Google is a big scary monster with great big teeth and great big eyes and they&#039;ve got robots! Robots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your common sense view of publishing is refreshing. Remember, though, that Google is a big scary monster with great big teeth and great big eyes and they&#8217;ve got robots! Robots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khalil A.</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/more-on-google-we-never-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-127622</link>
		<dc:creator>Khalil A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 06:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2006/06/04/1992/#comment-127622</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Books are not going away; books are, as all things do, evolving to meet needs.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m 100% with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Books are not going away; books are, as all things do, evolving to meet needs.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m 100% with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
