<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Think? Not So Much</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/</link>
	<description>Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookish Guide to SXSW</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-171669</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookish Guide to SXSW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-171669</guid>
		<description>[...] with snark via Twitter and accusations about unfair gatekeeping practices (read about it here, here and here). Afterwards, one of the panelists explained the audience-speaker clash by saying: that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with snark via Twitter and accusations about unfair gatekeeping practices (read about it here, here and here). Afterwards, one of the panelists explained the audience-speaker clash by saying: that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content Strategy Is About Publishing : Incisive.nu</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-171653</link>
		<dc:creator>Content Strategy Is About Publishing : Incisive.nu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-171653</guid>
		<description>[...] on the disastrous &#8220;New Think for Old Publishers&#8221; panel from SXSW 2009 (Booksquare, Medialoper, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the disastrous &#8220;New Think for Old Publishers&#8221; panel from SXSW 2009 (Booksquare, Medialoper, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Publishers Are Scarce at SXSW — Publishing Trends</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-170644</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Publishers Are Scarce at SXSW — Publishing Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-170644</guid>
		<description>[...] when they do show up, they’re not always treated with love and respect (see Booksquare&#8217;s &#8220;New Think? Not So Much&#8221;), but at worst it’s a love-hate relationship between the digital crowd and the page turners. At [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when they do show up, they’re not always treated with love and respect (see Booksquare&#8217;s &#8220;New Think? Not So Much&#8221;), but at worst it’s a love-hate relationship between the digital crowd and the page turners. At [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Books at SXSW? You Can Make It Happen &#124; Booksquare</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-170211</link>
		<dc:creator>Books at SXSW? You Can Make It Happen &#124; Booksquare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-170211</guid>
		<description>[...] Interactive festival. Last year, as we know, a panel put together by a group of publishers missed its target, angering the audience. This year&#8230;wow, it&#8217;s a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interactive festival. Last year, as we know, a panel put together by a group of publishers missed its target, angering the audience. This year&#8230;wow, it&#8217;s a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Next For Publishers? &#124; The Casual Optimist</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-169833</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s Next For Publishers? &#124; The Casual Optimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-169833</guid>
		<description>[...] has been well documented elsewhere, things did not go according to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been well documented elsewhere, things did not go according to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SXSW - Far From The Madding Crowd &#171; Eoin Purcell&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-169619</link>
		<dc:creator>SXSW - Far From The Madding Crowd &#171; Eoin Purcell&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-169619</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter it up There has been extensive coverage of the New Think For Old Publishers panel at SXSW on 14 March. By most accounts it was a complete and utter disaster for publishers. Here&#8217;s a sample of opinion more here, here and here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter it up There has been extensive coverage of the New Think For Old Publishers panel at SXSW on 14 March. By most accounts it was a complete and utter disaster for publishers. Here&#8217;s a sample of opinion more here, here and here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kassia Krozser</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-169376</link>
		<dc:creator>Kassia Krozser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-169376</guid>
		<description>Last one for the next few hours! Yep, Robert, sounds like we&#039;ve been in many of the same panels over the years (say hi next year!). I think the problem is that the publishing panels don&#039;t always reflect the tenor of the conference (this one would have likely been rejected if Clay Shirky hadn&#039;t been on the bill because it just didn&#039;t have anything special). But I do see smart things happening in books and smart people who want to get up and talk about them (or at least hold a multi-way discussion).  ToC is techy, BEA is sales-oriented, writer conferences focus on publishing. A few have discussed creating something that falls between ToC/BEA/etc, but I think we&#039;re still waiting for the right idea (though the Bookcamps that are springing up around the world are a good start).

Oh, and I so agree on the long introductions. In my last panel, I rushed through everyone&#039;s bio in mere minutes. Nobody was there to hear the blah, blah, blah, and it made for a better panel. SXSW is notorious for the loooong intros!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last one for the next few hours! Yep, Robert, sounds like we&#8217;ve been in many of the same panels over the years (say hi next year!). I think the problem is that the publishing panels don&#8217;t always reflect the tenor of the conference (this one would have likely been rejected if Clay Shirky hadn&#8217;t been on the bill because it just didn&#8217;t have anything special). But I do see smart things happening in books and smart people who want to get up and talk about them (or at least hold a multi-way discussion).  ToC is techy, BEA is sales-oriented, writer conferences focus on publishing. A few have discussed creating something that falls between ToC/BEA/etc, but I think we&#8217;re still waiting for the right idea (though the Bookcamps that are springing up around the world are a good start).</p>
<p>Oh, and I so agree on the long introductions. In my last panel, I rushed through everyone&#8217;s bio in mere minutes. Nobody was there to hear the blah, blah, blah, and it made for a better panel. SXSW is notorious for the loooong intros!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nagle</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-1/#comment-169374</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-169374</guid>
		<description>Sorry, one other thought (after reading your comment on Freebird books. 

First, all this talk about twitter and how panels ignore Twitter: pfooey! Twitter is good for those trying to follow things remotely, but panelists couldn&#039;t possibly be expected to keep up with all that back channel. Several people on other panels tried to with rotten results. 

Second, I enjoyed the looseness of core conversations in 2008. Too bad SXSW tried to turn core conversations into simply another minipanel this year (with the result that most were failures). It is a truism that  Q&amp;A tends to be more interesting than the panels themselves.  I&#039;d at least like to see that the panelists are reaching towards the same kinds of issues that audience members are reaching towards. At this particular panel, I heard  too much about industry solutions --interesting perhaps--but not really identifying a future of reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, one other thought (after reading your comment on Freebird books. </p>
<p>First, all this talk about twitter and how panels ignore Twitter: pfooey! Twitter is good for those trying to follow things remotely, but panelists couldn&#8217;t possibly be expected to keep up with all that back channel. Several people on other panels tried to with rotten results. </p>
<p>Second, I enjoyed the looseness of core conversations in 2008. Too bad SXSW tried to turn core conversations into simply another minipanel this year (with the result that most were failures). It is a truism that  Q&amp;A tends to be more interesting than the panels themselves.  I&#8217;d at least like to see that the panelists are reaching towards the same kinds of issues that audience members are reaching towards. At this particular panel, I heard  too much about industry solutions &#8211;interesting perhaps&#8211;but not really identifying a future of reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nagle</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-1/#comment-169372</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-169372</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Kassia, I was there also and was bored by it as well.  My observation is that publishing panels at SXSW have generally sucked (and I think we have been in quite a few together).  So I try to avoid going to them. But at that time slot that was the best thing happening. 

The problem is that everybody has too much to say at these panels, and most of the people in the industry want to get past the hot button issues which the audience wants to focus on.  Also, most of the publishing panel ideas got voted down anyway, so as a result people bring higher expectations to the panels that do make it. 

Book culture in particular don&#039;t give any special credibility to those who work in the industry or even big name authors.  

(By the way, I did find several excellent panels about books/storytelling; one on MadMan + twitter, and the panel at comic books. Both wonderful and focused). 

One underlying problem is that book people don&#039;t have special conferences suited to literary types. Out of the ones out there, TOC is too techy (and too $$$), Bookexpo is for people in the industry, MLA/AWP is too esoteric and academic. SXSW is probably a better mix than the others, but if I hear about one more panel on Web Design/Social Marketing/Building on an Online Community, I will go crazy.  I&#039;ve given serious thought about Breadloaf, but I don&#039;t really want to participate in workshops; I just want to talk to other writers and hear what they are working on (and swap ideas). 

I&#039;ve been going to SXSW for several years now, and I think now is the time for a decent Indie Publishing conference that is not merely about Book Selling or Meeting with Agents or How to Write Query Letters.  

As an aside, I wish panels could start by asking questions and making arguments rather than spending 10-15 minutes on introductions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Kassia, I was there also and was bored by it as well.  My observation is that publishing panels at SXSW have generally sucked (and I think we have been in quite a few together).  So I try to avoid going to them. But at that time slot that was the best thing happening. </p>
<p>The problem is that everybody has too much to say at these panels, and most of the people in the industry want to get past the hot button issues which the audience wants to focus on.  Also, most of the publishing panel ideas got voted down anyway, so as a result people bring higher expectations to the panels that do make it. </p>
<p>Book culture in particular don&#8217;t give any special credibility to those who work in the industry or even big name authors.  </p>
<p>(By the way, I did find several excellent panels about books/storytelling; one on MadMan + twitter, and the panel at comic books. Both wonderful and focused). </p>
<p>One underlying problem is that book people don&#8217;t have special conferences suited to literary types. Out of the ones out there, TOC is too techy (and too $$$), Bookexpo is for people in the industry, MLA/AWP is too esoteric and academic. SXSW is probably a better mix than the others, but if I hear about one more panel on Web Design/Social Marketing/Building on an Online Community, I will go crazy.  I&#8217;ve given serious thought about Breadloaf, but I don&#8217;t really want to participate in workshops; I just want to talk to other writers and hear what they are working on (and swap ideas). </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been going to SXSW for several years now, and I think now is the time for a decent Indie Publishing conference that is not merely about Book Selling or Meeting with Agents or How to Write Query Letters.  </p>
<p>As an aside, I wish panels could start by asking questions and making arguments rather than spending 10-15 minutes on introductions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Book Trailer Goes Pro &#171; Dennis Cass Wants You To Be More Awesome</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-1/#comment-169306</link>
		<dc:creator>The Book Trailer Goes Pro &#171; Dennis Cass Wants You To Be More Awesome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-169306</guid>
		<description>[...] hope is that they find more clients who are willing to take risks. In the wake of the fallout from the &#8220;New Think for Old Publishers&#8221; panel at this year&#8217;s South by Southwest, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hope is that they find more clients who are willing to take risks. In the wake of the fallout from the &#8220;New Think for Old Publishers&#8221; panel at this year&#8217;s South by Southwest, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
