<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Think? Not So Much</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/</link>
	<description>Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 06:15:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writing Without Copyright</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-173057</link>
		<dc:creator>Writing Without Copyright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-173057</guid>
		<description>[...] Even with early demand, publishers were slow to catch on. At a 2009 South by Southwest panel called &#8220;New Think for Old Publishers,&#8221; publishers walked away looking like a lonely middle aged guy desperately trying to convince a bunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even with early demand, publishers were slow to catch on. At a 2009 South by Southwest panel called &#8220;New Think for Old Publishers,&#8221; publishers walked away looking like a lonely middle aged guy desperately trying to convince a bunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Observations about Publishing Dinosaurs &#124; The Teich Group</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-172951</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Observations about Publishing Dinosaurs &#124; The Teich Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-172951</guid>
		<description>[...] Krozser of Booksquare berates traditional publishers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Krozser of Booksquare berates traditional publishers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A-twitter &#171; Martha Mihalick</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-171703</link>
		<dc:creator>A-twitter &#171; Martha Mihalick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 02:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-171703</guid>
		<description>[...] http://yodiwan.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/the-art-of-the-conversation-a-la-sxsw/ http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://yodiwan.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/the-art-of-the-conversation-a-la-sxsw/" rel="nofollow">http://yodiwan.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/the-art-of-the-conversation-a-la-sxsw/</a> <a href="http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/" rel="nofollow">http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookish Guide to SXSW</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-171669</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookish Guide to SXSW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-171669</guid>
		<description>[...] with snark via Twitter and accusations about unfair gatekeeping practices (read about it here, here and here). Afterwards, one of the panelists explained the audience-speaker clash by saying: that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with snark via Twitter and accusations about unfair gatekeeping practices (read about it here, here and here). Afterwards, one of the panelists explained the audience-speaker clash by saying: that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content Strategy Is About Publishing : Incisive.nu</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-171653</link>
		<dc:creator>Content Strategy Is About Publishing : Incisive.nu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-171653</guid>
		<description>[...] on the disastrous &#8220;New Think for Old Publishers&#8221; panel from SXSW 2009 (Booksquare, Medialoper, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the disastrous &#8220;New Think for Old Publishers&#8221; panel from SXSW 2009 (Booksquare, Medialoper, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Publishers Are Scarce at SXSW — Publishing Trends</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-170644</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Publishers Are Scarce at SXSW — Publishing Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-170644</guid>
		<description>[...] when they do show up, they’re not always treated with love and respect (see Booksquare&#8217;s &#8220;New Think? Not So Much&#8221;), but at worst it’s a love-hate relationship between the digital crowd and the page turners. At [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when they do show up, they’re not always treated with love and respect (see Booksquare&#8217;s &#8220;New Think? Not So Much&#8221;), but at worst it’s a love-hate relationship between the digital crowd and the page turners. At [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Books at SXSW? You Can Make It Happen &#124; Booksquare</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-170211</link>
		<dc:creator>Books at SXSW? You Can Make It Happen &#124; Booksquare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-170211</guid>
		<description>[...] Interactive festival. Last year, as we know, a panel put together by a group of publishers missed its target, angering the audience. This year&#8230;wow, it&#8217;s a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interactive festival. Last year, as we know, a panel put together by a group of publishers missed its target, angering the audience. This year&#8230;wow, it&#8217;s a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Next For Publishers? &#124; The Casual Optimist</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-169833</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s Next For Publishers? &#124; The Casual Optimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-169833</guid>
		<description>[...] has been well documented elsewhere, things did not go according to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been well documented elsewhere, things did not go according to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SXSW - Far From The Madding Crowd &#171; Eoin Purcell&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-169619</link>
		<dc:creator>SXSW - Far From The Madding Crowd &#171; Eoin Purcell&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-169619</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter it up There has been extensive coverage of the New Think For Old Publishers panel at SXSW on 14 March. By most accounts it was a complete and utter disaster for publishers. Here&#8217;s a sample of opinion more here, here and here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter it up There has been extensive coverage of the New Think For Old Publishers panel at SXSW on 14 March. By most accounts it was a complete and utter disaster for publishers. Here&#8217;s a sample of opinion more here, here and here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kassia Krozser</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/new-think-not-so-much/comment-page-2/#comment-169376</link>
		<dc:creator>Kassia Krozser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/?p=3146#comment-169376</guid>
		<description>Last one for the next few hours! Yep, Robert, sounds like we&#039;ve been in many of the same panels over the years (say hi next year!). I think the problem is that the publishing panels don&#039;t always reflect the tenor of the conference (this one would have likely been rejected if Clay Shirky hadn&#039;t been on the bill because it just didn&#039;t have anything special). But I do see smart things happening in books and smart people who want to get up and talk about them (or at least hold a multi-way discussion).  ToC is techy, BEA is sales-oriented, writer conferences focus on publishing. A few have discussed creating something that falls between ToC/BEA/etc, but I think we&#039;re still waiting for the right idea (though the Bookcamps that are springing up around the world are a good start).

Oh, and I so agree on the long introductions. In my last panel, I rushed through everyone&#039;s bio in mere minutes. Nobody was there to hear the blah, blah, blah, and it made for a better panel. SXSW is notorious for the loooong intros!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last one for the next few hours! Yep, Robert, sounds like we&#8217;ve been in many of the same panels over the years (say hi next year!). I think the problem is that the publishing panels don&#8217;t always reflect the tenor of the conference (this one would have likely been rejected if Clay Shirky hadn&#8217;t been on the bill because it just didn&#8217;t have anything special). But I do see smart things happening in books and smart people who want to get up and talk about them (or at least hold a multi-way discussion).  ToC is techy, BEA is sales-oriented, writer conferences focus on publishing. A few have discussed creating something that falls between ToC/BEA/etc, but I think we&#8217;re still waiting for the right idea (though the Bookcamps that are springing up around the world are a good start).</p>
<p>Oh, and I so agree on the long introductions. In my last panel, I rushed through everyone&#8217;s bio in mere minutes. Nobody was there to hear the blah, blah, blah, and it made for a better panel. SXSW is notorious for the loooong intros!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

