<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Decline of The Used Bookstore, The Rise of The Used Book Sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksquare.com/the-decline-of-the-used-bookstore-the-rise-of-the-used-book-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksquare.com/the-decline-of-the-used-bookstore-the-rise-of-the-used-book-sales/</link>
	<description>Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Booksquare</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/the-decline-of-the-used-bookstore-the-rise-of-the-used-book-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-106236</link>
		<dc:creator>Booksquare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/09/29/1599/#comment-106236</guid>
		<description>Richard, anytime you want to expound upon your thoughts, just say the word. I&#039;ve played around with  more elasticity in book prices, but haven&#039;t really formed a cohesive thought.

Used book sales *do* encourage many readers to try new authors, and, often, those readers will gravitate toward buying new. I&#039;m not going to pretend to get the ins and outs of economics, but I do know that price is a major factor when it comes to spending entertainment dollars. Quality is another. However, we need to acknowledge that the business model for buying and selling books has changed dramatically in the past ten years and will continue to change. One major change, of course, is that finding used books (including hard-to-find used titles) is becoming easier, and often, consumers don&#039;t see or know there&#039;s a different financial model for the authors and publishers when they choose to buy used.

My primary problem with the used book market is that, unlike many other forms of entertainment, there is only one shot at the royalty stream. Music has a used market, but also provides the opportunity for artists to collect royalties (and more) via radio, publishing, live appearances, and merchandising. Motion pictures, of course, have residuals and participations opportunities. Not every porject turns into retirement money, but you have the ability to make money over the long term.

Other countries have implemented various schemes to compensate artists for potential lost revenues due to piracy or home taping. I realize I&#039;m a lone voice in the &quot;taking this notion seriously&quot; camp, but at some point, the volume of used sales is going to require that authors and publishers discuss ways to protect their business while still maintaining a valuable resource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, anytime you want to expound upon your thoughts, just say the word. I&#8217;ve played around with  more elasticity in book prices, but haven&#8217;t really formed a cohesive thought.</p>
<p>Used book sales *do* encourage many readers to try new authors, and, often, those readers will gravitate toward buying new. I&#8217;m not going to pretend to get the ins and outs of economics, but I do know that price is a major factor when it comes to spending entertainment dollars. Quality is another. However, we need to acknowledge that the business model for buying and selling books has changed dramatically in the past ten years and will continue to change. One major change, of course, is that finding used books (including hard-to-find used titles) is becoming easier, and often, consumers don&#8217;t see or know there&#8217;s a different financial model for the authors and publishers when they choose to buy used.</p>
<p>My primary problem with the used book market is that, unlike many other forms of entertainment, there is only one shot at the royalty stream. Music has a used market, but also provides the opportunity for artists to collect royalties (and more) via radio, publishing, live appearances, and merchandising. Motion pictures, of course, have residuals and participations opportunities. Not every porject turns into retirement money, but you have the ability to make money over the long term.</p>
<p>Other countries have implemented various schemes to compensate artists for potential lost revenues due to piracy or home taping. I realize I&#8217;m a lone voice in the &#8220;taking this notion seriously&#8221; camp, but at some point, the volume of used sales is going to require that authors and publishers discuss ways to protect their business while still maintaining a valuable resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mapletree7</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/the-decline-of-the-used-bookstore-the-rise-of-the-used-book-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-106228</link>
		<dc:creator>mapletree7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/09/29/1599/#comment-106228</guid>
		<description>Used book sales support sales of new books.

See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/28/technology/28scene.html?ex=1280203200&amp;en=33765024cbf62d4c&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this &lt;i&gt;New York Times article&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Used book sales support sales of new books.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/28/technology/28scene.html?ex=1280203200&amp;en=33765024cbf62d4c&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss" rel="nofollow">this <i>New York Times article</i></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Nash</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/the-decline-of-the-used-bookstore-the-rise-of-the-used-book-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-106218</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/09/29/1599/#comment-106218</guid>
		<description>Economists have pretty clearly demonstrated that the existence of the used book marketplace (well, any secondary market) encourages people to buy books at full retail, because they know they can re-sell them. It&#039;s another way of expressing price elasticityâ€”Iâ€™ll buy this for $5 but not for $14. Because we have to set fixed prices, $14 letâ€™s say, weâ€™re stuck being unable to sell books to people willing to only pay $10. Those would all be lost sales but for the used market which allows people to buy and re-sell, the difference between the price being in effect the price theyâ€™re willing to pay. 

An economist would typically illustrate this with a graph, which is more more intuitive to grasp than my description. In effect one axis would have volume, the other price. A diagonal line represents the number of people willing to buy at a given price (noone will pay a million, a lotta people will buy for a dollar). The book is given a fixed price and everybody whose accepted price is above that fixed pint will buy, and no one who is below the fixed price will.

What the used book market allows for not only PURCHASES by people unwilling to pay the fixed price but SALES by people unwillling to pay the fixed price. The after market encourages the full price sales in the primary market.

One of thiese days I&#039;d love to go into why in don&#039;t think books are in fact too expensive but are simply priced in too fixed a manner, preventing the kinds of price discrimination that can help both producers and consumers, but I&#039;ll spare all y&#039;all that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economists have pretty clearly demonstrated that the existence of the used book marketplace (well, any secondary market) encourages people to buy books at full retail, because they know they can re-sell them. It&#8217;s another way of expressing price elasticityâ€”Iâ€™ll buy this for $5 but not for $14. Because we have to set fixed prices, $14 letâ€™s say, weâ€™re stuck being unable to sell books to people willing to only pay $10. Those would all be lost sales but for the used market which allows people to buy and re-sell, the difference between the price being in effect the price theyâ€™re willing to pay. </p>
<p>An economist would typically illustrate this with a graph, which is more more intuitive to grasp than my description. In effect one axis would have volume, the other price. A diagonal line represents the number of people willing to buy at a given price (noone will pay a million, a lotta people will buy for a dollar). The book is given a fixed price and everybody whose accepted price is above that fixed pint will buy, and no one who is below the fixed price will.</p>
<p>What the used book market allows for not only PURCHASES by people unwilling to pay the fixed price but SALES by people unwillling to pay the fixed price. The after market encourages the full price sales in the primary market.</p>
<p>One of thiese days I&#8217;d love to go into why in don&#8217;t think books are in fact too expensive but are simply priced in too fixed a manner, preventing the kinds of price discrimination that can help both producers and consumers, but I&#8217;ll spare all y&#8217;all that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernita</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/the-decline-of-the-used-bookstore-the-rise-of-the-used-book-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-106184</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/09/29/1599/#comment-106184</guid>
		<description>Often I find an author I like in a used book store and then proceed to buy new everything they write from then on.Doubt that I&#039;m unusual in this. Has no one considered this factor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often I find an author I like in a used book store and then proceed to buy new everything they write from then on.Doubt that I&#8217;m unusual in this. Has no one considered this factor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

