<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Print Fidelity and Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/</link>
	<description>Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accessibility and Print &#171; sylvia&#39;s thoughts</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-171556</link>
		<dc:creator>Accessibility and Print &#171; sylvia&#39;s thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-171556</guid>
		<description>[...] website I found is called Booksquare which discusses the issues and events taking place in the publishing industry. One of the articles [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] website I found is called Booksquare which discusses the issues and events taking place in the publishing industry. One of the articles [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-170392</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian O'Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170392</guid>
		<description>Although not directly targeted at the issue of accessibility, a New York Times piece on format proliferation amplifies the challenge, and the opportunity: http://bit.ly/idQ0b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although not directly targeted at the issue of accessibility, a New York Times piece on format proliferation amplifies the challenge, and the opportunity: <a href="http://bit.ly/idQ0b" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/idQ0b</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-170390</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian O'Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170390</guid>
		<description>Earlier this month, I likened the format debate to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: with digital content, you can control format, or you can support multiple uses, but it is hard and pretty expensive to try to do both.  It made me wonder out loud if look and feel was something publishers were willing to let go: http://bit.ly/MR8Mr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month, I likened the format debate to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: with digital content, you can control format, or you can support multiple uses, but it is hard and pretty expensive to try to do both.  It made me wonder out loud if look and feel was something publishers were willing to let go: <a href="http://bit.ly/MR8Mr" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/MR8Mr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-170387</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170387</guid>
		<description>I was that person up at 3AM with a baby in one arm, and I used my internet tablet extensively in the dead of the night.  Not only is it one-handed, but illuminated -- perfect while bouncing a colicky infant on an exercise ball... for hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was that person up at 3AM with a baby in one arm, and I used my internet tablet extensively in the dead of the night.  Not only is it one-handed, but illuminated &#8212; perfect while bouncing a colicky infant on an exercise ball&#8230; for hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Tiano</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-170386</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170386</guid>
		<description>See, now, as a boo designer, I&#039;m convinced that my job is to bring the author&#039;s words to the reader. It&#039;s not about me. Consequently, readability is my Job #1, to purloin from Ford Motor Co.

If we don&#039;t make readable and attractive books, we give readers one less reason to look for physical, printed books and periodicals. I understand some of the attraction of Kindle and like electronic readers, but they don&#039;t give one the pleasure of cracking open a stiff, new book with its nw book smell.

That said, to remain relevant, I think we book designers do need to learn to design for Kindle. Making e-books attractive will be challenging and that should be worth something, as well as fun to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, now, as a boo designer, I&#8217;m convinced that my job is to bring the author&#8217;s words to the reader. It&#8217;s not about me. Consequently, readability is my Job #1, to purloin from Ford Motor Co.</p>
<p>If we don&#8217;t make readable and attractive books, we give readers one less reason to look for physical, printed books and periodicals. I understand some of the attraction of Kindle and like electronic readers, but they don&#8217;t give one the pleasure of cracking open a stiff, new book with its nw book smell.</p>
<p>That said, to remain relevant, I think we book designers do need to learn to design for Kindle. Making e-books attractive will be challenging and that should be worth something, as well as fun to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kassia Krozser</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-170383</link>
		<dc:creator>Kassia Krozser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170383</guid>
		<description>Kimberly -- The Kindle 2 *is* usable by a blind reader, and of course that statement comes with caveats. The way you would use it would be to utilize the text-to-speech functionality. You get a clunky, robotic voice reading in about real time. The bigger problem is that many publishers and authors, spurred on by what they perceived to be an assault on their audio/performance rights, have disabled the text-to-speech functionality on their books (Random House being one who cites this proudly!). So what might have been a useful, if imperfect, feature has been rendered largely useless by the publishing industry.

I think it&#039;s too bad because it would have opened the door to more books at more affordable prices, despite the lack of compelling experience (though, if embraced by the vision impaired constituency, Amazon might have been inspired to improve the experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimberly &#8212; The Kindle 2 *is* usable by a blind reader, and of course that statement comes with caveats. The way you would use it would be to utilize the text-to-speech functionality. You get a clunky, robotic voice reading in about real time. The bigger problem is that many publishers and authors, spurred on by what they perceived to be an assault on their audio/performance rights, have disabled the text-to-speech functionality on their books (Random House being one who cites this proudly!). So what might have been a useful, if imperfect, feature has been rendered largely useless by the publishing industry.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s too bad because it would have opened the door to more books at more affordable prices, despite the lack of compelling experience (though, if embraced by the vision impaired constituency, Amazon might have been inspired to improve the experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly Gardner</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-170380</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170380</guid>
		<description>Is the Kindle 2 even usable by a blind reader? I am visually impaired and have lusted after the Kindle since its introduction mainly for the vast array of titles I could access with it. But I assumed that the device itself would not be usable because, let&#039;s face it, most nifty techno gadgets aren&#039;t user friendly for a totally blind user. Ipod anyone?

I have been an ebook consumer since the very early days and a voracious reader since childhood. The idea that, with a kindle or other device, I could have access to the same books as everyone else is simply beyond my wildest reading fantasies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the Kindle 2 even usable by a blind reader? I am visually impaired and have lusted after the Kindle since its introduction mainly for the vast array of titles I could access with it. But I assumed that the device itself would not be usable because, let&#8217;s face it, most nifty techno gadgets aren&#8217;t user friendly for a totally blind user. Ipod anyone?</p>
<p>I have been an ebook consumer since the very early days and a voracious reader since childhood. The idea that, with a kindle or other device, I could have access to the same books as everyone else is simply beyond my wildest reading fantasies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kassia Krozser</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-170368</link>
		<dc:creator>Kassia Krozser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170368</guid>
		<description>Talk about limiting the audience! I&#039;m not sure how many years of whining it will take before I&#039;ll obtain one of the (still mythical) Apple tablets!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about limiting the audience! I&#8217;m not sure how many years of whining it will take before I&#8217;ll obtain one of the (still mythical) Apple tablets!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-170367</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170367</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;A frustration I have with books released via the Scrollmotion App is the insistence on maintaining print fidelity. 

Yes, when I first saw the way they were doing things, I couldn&#039;t understand why.

Then I thought about why they would do that.

It&#039;s obvious: It was built from the start for a larger screen.  Just think of how great that&#039;ll be on an iTablet!  No more vertical scrolling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;A frustration I have with books released via the Scrollmotion App is the insistence on maintaining print fidelity. </p>
<p>Yes, when I first saw the way they were doing things, I couldn&#8217;t understand why.</p>
<p>Then I thought about why they would do that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious: It was built from the start for a larger screen.  Just think of how great that&#8217;ll be on an iTablet!  No more vertical scrolling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cottonwood</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/comment-page-1/#comment-170366</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cottonwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170366</guid>
		<description>Writers get so attached to the printed word that they forget history:  Storytelling is an oral tradition.  It started with the cavemen.  The printed book, whether digital or on paper, is a relatively new invention and merely an imitation of the incredible power of the spoken word.

The same digital advances that allow e-books also allow e-audiobooks, and many writers (and their readers) are taking advantage of it through podcasting or other means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writers get so attached to the printed word that they forget history:  Storytelling is an oral tradition.  It started with the cavemen.  The printed book, whether digital or on paper, is a relatively new invention and merely an imitation of the incredible power of the spoken word.</p>
<p>The same digital advances that allow e-books also allow e-audiobooks, and many writers (and their readers) are taking advantage of it through podcasting or other means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

