<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Maureen Dowd Should Avoid Bookstores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksquare.com/why-maureen-dowd-should-avoid-bookstores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksquare.com/why-maureen-dowd-should-avoid-bookstores/</link>
	<description>Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Feeding The Flock &#187; Blog Archive &#187; pink &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/why-maureen-dowd-should-avoid-bookstores/comment-page-1/#comment-168307</link>
		<dc:creator>Feeding The Flock &#187; Blog Archive &#187; pink &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2007/02/14/2298/#comment-168307</guid>
		<description>[...] the letters seemed to agree with ms. dowd&#8217;s point of view&#8230; some other responses were: Booksquare and Fearless Voices &#8230; others posted the article with no comments, so maybe they agree with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the letters seemed to agree with ms. dowd&#8217;s point of view&#8230; some other responses were: Booksquare and Fearless Voices &#8230; others posted the article with no comments, so maybe they agree with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suddenly I was swimming in pink. &#171; Every Day is a Winding Road&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/why-maureen-dowd-should-avoid-bookstores/comment-page-1/#comment-165335</link>
		<dc:creator>Suddenly I was swimming in pink. &#171; Every Day is a Winding Road&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 18:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2007/02/14/2298/#comment-165335</guid>
		<description>[...] View Full Krozser Article  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View Full Krozser Article  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thayer</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/why-maureen-dowd-should-avoid-bookstores/comment-page-1/#comment-165215</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2007/02/14/2298/#comment-165215</guid>
		<description>K2, I guess Maureen Dowd is starting an Inspector General series although Shopping with Leon was flawed from the beginning since the article&#039;s premise was outrage before she left the Times in search of same.  Leon&#039;s remark about being at war falls into the abyss since women are not home riveting F-16s in the event the Iraqi army storm the Jersey shore. Your instinct is correct: Dowd is patronizing and Leon shouldn&#039;t be shopping anyway. Nice work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K2, I guess Maureen Dowd is starting an Inspector General series although Shopping with Leon was flawed from the beginning since the article&#8217;s premise was outrage before she left the Times in search of same.  Leon&#8217;s remark about being at war falls into the abyss since women are not home riveting F-16s in the event the Iraqi army storm the Jersey shore. Your instinct is correct: Dowd is patronizing and Leon shouldn&#8217;t be shopping anyway. Nice work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/why-maureen-dowd-should-avoid-bookstores/comment-page-1/#comment-165199</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2007/02/14/2298/#comment-165199</guid>
		<description>I blogged about this yesterday because I couldn&#039;t resist any longer. The smug commentary about The Red Badge of Courage made my stomach hurt for days. As if it&#039;s either romance OR &quot;true literature&quot;

The smug,  sexist classism of both Dowd and &quot;her friend&quot; at the New Republic make me cringe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blogged about this yesterday because I couldn&#8217;t resist any longer. The smug commentary about The Red Badge of Courage made my stomach hurt for days. As if it&#8217;s either romance OR &#8220;true literature&#8221;</p>
<p>The smug,  sexist classism of both Dowd and &#8220;her friend&#8221; at the New Republic make me cringe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kassia Krozser</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/why-maureen-dowd-should-avoid-bookstores/comment-page-1/#comment-165194</link>
		<dc:creator>Kassia Krozser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2007/02/14/2298/#comment-165194</guid>
		<description>I honestly think that Dowd was making up her outrage. Seriously. You&#039;d have to live under a rock to have missed the chicklit explosion. 

While I&#039;m willing to agree that Dowd had a point, I&#039;m not so sure about the cogent. I think she danced up to the edge of an argument we&#039;d both love to have (or would it be debate, or is it a debate if we&#039;re both on the same side), then she chose preciousness over substance. She missed the opportunity to discuss the fact that it&#039;s so hard for women&#039;s stories to make an impact on the market...which, in my more feminist moments, is a result of the focus on &quot;guy&quot; fiction. But you know me, always whining.

I would argue that there is quite a bit beyond the single girl in cities books. Marian Keyes (who, you know, makes me go all fangirl). You can be smart and funny and very much about the modern world. Keyes often explores dysfunctional families in a loving context. She also explores issues like addiction in ways that make you cringe. In a good way. There are others, though the ones that come to mind on a mainstream scale are British. Which says more about American publishers than it does American writers.

However, if you&#039;re looking for a great book about women&#039;s lives, I totally recommend Valerie Trueblood&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;Seven Loves&lt;/strong&gt;. It&#039;s a  novel-in-stories about the various loves in one woman&#039;s life. Beautiful. Oh my, it was great to read. I also loved Elizabeth Poliner&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;Mutual Life &amp; Casualty&lt;/strong&gt;. Both are, to a degree, exploring women from another era (especially the 70&#039;s), but both are also, I&#039;d argue, a sort of chicklit, if you&#039;re willing to accept that the genre looks at the life experience of women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly think that Dowd was making up her outrage. Seriously. You&#8217;d have to live under a rock to have missed the chicklit explosion. </p>
<p>While I&#8217;m willing to agree that Dowd had a point, I&#8217;m not so sure about the cogent. I think she danced up to the edge of an argument we&#8217;d both love to have (or would it be debate, or is it a debate if we&#8217;re both on the same side), then she chose preciousness over substance. She missed the opportunity to discuss the fact that it&#8217;s so hard for women&#8217;s stories to make an impact on the market&#8230;which, in my more feminist moments, is a result of the focus on &#8220;guy&#8221; fiction. But you know me, always whining.</p>
<p>I would argue that there is quite a bit beyond the single girl in cities books. Marian Keyes (who, you know, makes me go all fangirl). You can be smart and funny and very much about the modern world. Keyes often explores dysfunctional families in a loving context. She also explores issues like addiction in ways that make you cringe. In a good way. There are others, though the ones that come to mind on a mainstream scale are British. Which says more about American publishers than it does American writers.</p>
<p>However, if you&#8217;re looking for a great book about women&#8217;s lives, I totally recommend Valerie Trueblood&#8217;s <strong>Seven Loves</strong>. It&#8217;s a  novel-in-stories about the various loves in one woman&#8217;s life. Beautiful. Oh my, it was great to read. I also loved Elizabeth Poliner&#8217;s <strong>Mutual Life &#038; Casualty</strong>. Both are, to a degree, exploring women from another era (especially the 70&#8217;s), but both are also, I&#8217;d argue, a sort of chicklit, if you&#8217;re willing to accept that the genre looks at the life experience of women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://booksquare.com/why-maureen-dowd-should-avoid-bookstores/comment-page-1/#comment-165189</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2007/02/14/2298/#comment-165189</guid>
		<description>BS, you are beautiful when on a soapbox.

The Dowd piece was a bit baffling for its lack of relevancy.  Her outrage would have seemed more timely two or three years ago, when bookstores were overflowing with pink covered books.  Now, this seems more beating a dead horse than topical.  

That said, she makes some cogent, if shallow, broad-stroked points about chicklit.  Even counting myself as a devoted fan of single girls in the city books, when I see plot after plot, with seemingly little change from author to author, I wonder what other stories about women&#039;s lives there are to tell.  And, more importantly, why there doesn&#039;t seem to be room for them on bookstore shelves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BS, you are beautiful when on a soapbox.</p>
<p>The Dowd piece was a bit baffling for its lack of relevancy.  Her outrage would have seemed more timely two or three years ago, when bookstores were overflowing with pink covered books.  Now, this seems more beating a dead horse than topical.  </p>
<p>That said, she makes some cogent, if shallow, broad-stroked points about chicklit.  Even counting myself as a devoted fan of single girls in the city books, when I see plot after plot, with seemingly little change from author to author, I wonder what other stories about women&#8217;s lives there are to tell.  And, more importantly, why there doesn&#8217;t seem to be room for them on bookstore shelves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
