Comments on: An Amusement https://booksquare.com/an-amusement/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&%23038;utm_campaign=an-amusement Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:14:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Booksquare https://booksquare.com/an-amusement/#comment-106051 Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:14:10 +0000 http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/09/22/1588/#comment-106051 This is true, though possibly Gabaldon isn’t the best choice. She’s quite popular with a large segment of women (and more than a few men).

I think people do tend toward name recognition. Titles need lots and lots of repetition before they permeate the public consciousness. Especially since so many books are released. I’m all for adventurous reading but have to be honest with myself — many books require incredibly intense brain time. If I’ve been chairing meetings and analyzing information all day with a minimum of two hours’ commuting involved, then I have to allow my mind a period of recovery. I’m going to pick up a book that falls within a certain comfort zone. An Oprah label tells me certain information about a book, a NYT label tells me something entirely different. It’s not quite detailed analysis, but at least I have guidelines out there.

]]>
By: Malcolm Campbell https://booksquare.com/an-amusement/#comment-106049 Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:04:01 +0000 http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2005/09/22/1588/#comment-106049 Somebody needs to try an experiment. Stand on a street corner with a stack of books everyone’s heard of and see how many men and women are willing to take away a free copy: “Hello, I’m giving away new copies of Dan Brown’s books” or “Hello, I’ve got 20 copies of the latest Gabaldon book ‘A Breath of Snow and Ashes’: would you like one?”

Books that nobody’s heard of are not only hard to sell, they’re harder to give away. Most folks want Oprah’s stamp of approval and/or a notarized copy of the NYT bestseller list before they’ll buy.

]]>