Comments on: Soft Skull and PopMatters Sitting In A Tree https://booksquare.com/soft-skull-and-popmatters-sitting-in-a-tree/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&%23038;utm_campaign=soft-skull-and-popmatters-sitting-in-a-tree Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:04:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Booksquare https://booksquare.com/soft-skull-and-popmatters-sitting-in-a-tree/#comment-118019 Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:04:05 +0000 http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2006/01/11/1739/#comment-118019 Actually, the project sounds very cool (yes, I’ve been trained to read press release speak). It’s quite exciting — though I do understand one’s need to check certain inclinations at the door. We are, after all, a civilized society.

Send puffery away. I feel confident it will be better spelled, more logical, and more relevant than most of what I get. Plus it’s so nice to hear from you!

]]> By: Richard Nash https://booksquare.com/soft-skull-and-popmatters-sitting-in-a-tree/#comment-118013 Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:28:09 +0000 http://www.booksquare.com/archives/2006/01/11/1739/#comment-118013 But it’s just a “news” bit. It’s a spiel. When I’ve got something real and substantial, and not just as “I’ll do some cool stuff with PopMatters in 2007…” I’ll totally let you know.

And I’ll blog about it when it’s more than a press release.

I may be a media whore, but even I have my limits. I try to check my flackery before entering the blog door…

That all said, you are a publishing blog, as oppsed to a pure book blog, so if you don’t mind getting the puffery that GalleyGat and Michael Cader and PW and Rachel Sklar get from me, then you asked for it 😉

]]>