Comments on: Thoughts on Print Fidelity and Accessibility https://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&%23038;utm_campaign=thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility Dissecting the publishing industry with love and skepticism Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:46:06 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Accessibility and Print « sylvia's thoughts https://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-171556 Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:46:06 +0000 http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-171556 […] website I found is called Booksquare which discusses the issues and events taking place in the publishing industry. One of the articles […]

]]>
By: Brian O'Leary https://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170392 Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:36:09 +0000 http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170392 Although not directly targeted at the issue of accessibility, a New York Times piece on format proliferation amplifies the challenge, and the opportunity: http://bit.ly/idQ0b

]]>
By: Brian O'Leary https://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170390 Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:32:55 +0000 http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170390 Earlier this month, I likened the format debate to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: with digital content, you can control format, or you can support multiple uses, but it is hard and pretty expensive to try to do both. It made me wonder out loud if look and feel was something publishers were willing to let go: http://bit.ly/MR8Mr

]]>
By: kat https://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170387 Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:57:52 +0000 http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170387 I was that person up at 3AM with a baby in one arm, and I used my internet tablet extensively in the dead of the night. Not only is it one-handed, but illuminated — perfect while bouncing a colicky infant on an exercise ball… for hours.

]]>
By: Stephen Tiano https://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170386 Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:12:08 +0000 http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170386 See, now, as a boo designer, I’m convinced that my job is to bring the author’s words to the reader. It’s not about me. Consequently, readability is my Job #1, to purloin from Ford Motor Co.

If we don’t make readable and attractive books, we give readers one less reason to look for physical, printed books and periodicals. I understand some of the attraction of Kindle and like electronic readers, but they don’t give one the pleasure of cracking open a stiff, new book with its nw book smell.

That said, to remain relevant, I think we book designers do need to learn to design for Kindle. Making e-books attractive will be challenging and that should be worth something, as well as fun to do.

]]>
By: Kassia Krozser https://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170383 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:56:23 +0000 http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170383 In reply to Kimberly Gardner.

Kimberly — The Kindle 2 *is* usable by a blind reader, and of course that statement comes with caveats. The way you would use it would be to utilize the text-to-speech functionality. You get a clunky, robotic voice reading in about real time. The bigger problem is that many publishers and authors, spurred on by what they perceived to be an assault on their audio/performance rights, have disabled the text-to-speech functionality on their books (Random House being one who cites this proudly!). So what might have been a useful, if imperfect, feature has been rendered largely useless by the publishing industry.

I think it’s too bad because it would have opened the door to more books at more affordable prices, despite the lack of compelling experience (though, if embraced by the vision impaired constituency, Amazon might have been inspired to improve the experience.

]]>
By: Kimberly Gardner https://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170380 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:54:52 +0000 http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170380 Is the Kindle 2 even usable by a blind reader? I am visually impaired and have lusted after the Kindle since its introduction mainly for the vast array of titles I could access with it. But I assumed that the device itself would not be usable because, let’s face it, most nifty techno gadgets aren’t user friendly for a totally blind user. Ipod anyone?

I have been an ebook consumer since the very early days and a voracious reader since childhood. The idea that, with a kindle or other device, I could have access to the same books as everyone else is simply beyond my wildest reading fantasies.

]]>
By: Kassia Krozser https://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170368 Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:42:02 +0000 http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170368 In reply to Mike Cane.

Talk about limiting the audience! I’m not sure how many years of whining it will take before I’ll obtain one of the (still mythical) Apple tablets!

]]>
By: Mike Cane https://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170367 Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:28:14 +0000 http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170367 >>>A frustration I have with books released via the Scrollmotion App is the insistence on maintaining print fidelity.

Yes, when I first saw the way they were doing things, I couldn’t understand why.

Then I thought about why they would do that.

It’s obvious: It was built from the start for a larger screen. Just think of how great that’ll be on an iTablet! No more vertical scrolling.

]]>
By: Joe Cottonwood https://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170366 Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:11:05 +0000 http://booksquare.com/thoughts-on-print-fidelity-and-accessibility/#comment-170366 Writers get so attached to the printed word that they forget history: Storytelling is an oral tradition. It started with the cavemen. The printed book, whether digital or on paper, is a relatively new invention and merely an imitation of the incredible power of the spoken word.

The same digital advances that allow e-books also allow e-audiobooks, and many writers (and their readers) are taking advantage of it through podcasting or other means.

]]>