Now, don’t get us wrong, we like having far too much information. If we’re overwhwelmed by a subject, we’re happy (generally, because this means we’re so busy “researching” that we’re not “working”). But, let’s be honest — it’s hard enough getting people to put alt attributes on images. How can anyone expect articles filled with context-driven messages? And what happens when someone goes overboard and every conjunction has a context menu?
Yes, the web can be used to provide endless avenues of discovery, but, maybe it’s the print reader in us or our natural crankiness, but there’s a point where context overload can interfere with actual reading. Hmm, in rereading that sentence, it’s definitely Miss Cranky coming out to play. She’s overdue for her nap…
P.S. – We reserve the right to change our mind if someone presents a working model that doesn’t irritate us.
2 responses so far ↓
sadi ranson-polizzotti // Jan 28, 2005 at 6:24 pm
hey. love this site and you’ve commented on my articles, but how do i get to exchange links with you? I would gladly link back – think i did already, but could you include http://www.tantmieux.squarespace.com in your link list too? Please let me know your policy.
Sorry to use comments. Didn’t see anyother way to contact you, though that said, don’t have my glasses on…
cheers,
sadi ranson-polizzotti
editor
tantmieux
http://www.tantmieux.squarespace.com voted as outstanding site by squarespace.com and more.
BJ // Jan 30, 2005 at 4:01 pm
I actually love this idea. It would save people like me (who are dashing off to new windows to look something up every few words) a lot of time. The only problem is, if you didn’t park your mouse in the right place, you’d have context-sensitive menus dropping down like artillery fire. EEEK!